<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Manufacture This</title>
	<link>http://www.manufacturethis.org</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 02:43:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>Comment on China Index by Buy American</title>
		<link>http://www.manufacturethis.org/2008/06/18/china-index/#comment-36383</link>
		<author>Buy American</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 20:40:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.manufacturethis.org/2008/06/18/china-index/#comment-36383</guid>
					<description>This is just the tip of the iceberg.  I've been looking for a dehumidifier also, and almost bought a Kenmore at Sears. After seeing  Made in China I decided to check reviews.  Sears has a Satisfaction Guarantee return policy that's good for up to 30 days after purchase. But guess what, you have to pay a 15% restocking fee if it has been used. If you take it in under warranty, you pay $30 for them to decide if it's covered under warranty. Companies like this,  that want to import everything they sell, deserve to go belly-up. Just about everything I've seen that's made in China, Korea, Taiwan, and don't forget Mexico, is disposable. You still pay the same price as when the products were Made in the USA, but now you get junk that won't last, American workers are losing jobs, and the retailers are making a killing. When are the corrupt politicians that are running this country going to wake up and do something to get this Country on the right track, instead of the Fast Track to disaster for our economy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is just the tip of the iceberg.  I&#8217;ve been looking for a dehumidifier also, and almost bought a Kenmore at Sears. After seeing  Made in China I decided to check reviews.  Sears has a Satisfaction Guarantee return policy that&#8217;s good for up to 30 days after purchase. But guess what, you have to pay a 15% restocking fee if it has been used. If you take it in under warranty, you pay $30 for them to decide if it&#8217;s covered under warranty. Companies like this,  that want to import everything they sell, deserve to go belly-up. Just about everything I&#8217;ve seen that&#8217;s made in China, Korea, Taiwan, and don&#8217;t forget Mexico, is disposable. You still pay the same price as when the products were Made in the USA, but now you get junk that won&#8217;t last, American workers are losing jobs, and the retailers are making a killing. When are the corrupt politicians that are running this country going to wake up and do something to get this Country on the right track, instead of the Fast Track to disaster for our economy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on “A Year Late and a Bit Short” by Paul Sabbah</title>
		<link>http://www.manufacturethis.org/2008/07/22/%e2%80%9ca-year-late-and-a-bit-short%e2%80%9d/#comment-36380</link>
		<author>Paul Sabbah</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 19:26:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.manufacturethis.org/2008/07/22/%e2%80%9ca-year-late-and-a-bit-short%e2%80%9d/#comment-36380</guid>
					<description>Steven, I won't argue the fact that we can do a better job negotiating our trade agreements with our global partners, at the same time we should approve those trade agreements which have been negotiated and let US companies try to sell in those markets (Colombia, Panama, South Korea).  The CEA campaign is taking that message on the road, and Congress needs to hear it from voters as well as business people.   

At the same time, I suggest you read the PCIC report on the Apple Ipod (http://pcic.merage.uci.edu/papers/2007/AppleiPod.pdf) which might give you a different view of that Chinese trade deficit for electronics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steven, I won&#8217;t argue the fact that we can do a better job negotiating our trade agreements with our global partners, at the same time we should approve those trade agreements which have been negotiated and let US companies try to sell in those markets (Colombia, Panama, South Korea).  The CEA campaign is taking that message on the road, and Congress needs to hear it from voters as well as business people.   </p>
<p>At the same time, I suggest you read the PCIC report on the Apple Ipod (http://pcic.merage.uci.edu/papers/2007/AppleiPod.pdf) which might give you a different view of that Chinese trade deficit for electronics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Reversing the Engines by jmk</title>
		<link>http://www.manufacturethis.org/2008/07/15/reversing-the-engines/#comment-35866</link>
		<author>jmk</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 20:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.manufacturethis.org/2008/07/15/reversing-the-engines/#comment-35866</guid>
					<description>Cymer is an American company that is world's leading producer of semiconductor lithography light source. But it relies solely on foreign suppliers for the critical enabling optical components required to manufacture the light source. This shows how dependent supposedly world beating American manufacturing companies are totally reliant on foreign suppliers for their critical manufacturing inputs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cymer is an American company that is world&#8217;s leading producer of semiconductor lithography light source. But it relies solely on foreign suppliers for the critical enabling optical components required to manufacture the light source. This shows how dependent supposedly world beating American manufacturing companies are totally reliant on foreign suppliers for their critical manufacturing inputs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Admitting a Big Mistake by Robert A. Agnew</title>
		<link>http://www.manufacturethis.org/2008/06/09/admitting-a-big-mistake/#comment-33302</link>
		<author>Robert A. Agnew</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 03:42:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.manufacturethis.org/2008/06/09/admitting-a-big-mistake/#comment-33302</guid>
					<description>Many US citizens have been alarmed by the accelerating erosion of our manufacturing base and the associated loss of both high wage jobs and ongoing capital expenditures.  This includes former trade policy heavyweights like Robert Cassidy and William Daley, plus an increasing number of economists.  For a different take on the economics of outsourcing, see "Anatomy of Outsourcing" at members.aol.com/raagnew.  My thesis is that America has not been adequately compensated for opening her borders.  The result, of course, has been limited resources for trade adjustment assistance and mushrooming foreign debt.  I would venture to guess that our trading partners have been astounded by our muddleheadedness and by their consequent good fortune.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many US citizens have been alarmed by the accelerating erosion of our manufacturing base and the associated loss of both high wage jobs and ongoing capital expenditures.  This includes former trade policy heavyweights like Robert Cassidy and William Daley, plus an increasing number of economists.  For a different take on the economics of outsourcing, see &#8220;Anatomy of Outsourcing&#8221; at members.aol.com/raagnew.  My thesis is that America has not been adequately compensated for opening her borders.  The result, of course, has been limited resources for trade adjustment assistance and mushrooming foreign debt.  I would venture to guess that our trading partners have been astounded by our muddleheadedness and by their consequent good fortune.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on IRONY, Made in China by Gabor Steingart</title>
		<link>http://www.manufacturethis.org/2008/06/11/irony-made-in-china/#comment-33272</link>
		<author>Gabor Steingart</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 18:51:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.manufacturethis.org/2008/06/11/irony-made-in-china/#comment-33272</guid>
					<description>The Iron Fist of Government: China’s 
Controlled Market Economy 
By Gabor Steingart

US officials like talking about free market economies doing free trade, but our todays global economy is anything but free. In the competion beween the US and a guided economy like China there is no such thing as free trade.

The state plays an important, perhaps even the deciding, role in 
the redistribution of wealth and power, even in the West. It ensures that all companies whereever they come from find a level playing field for their investment. Child labor is baned in Missippi and in North Dakota. Federal tax laws are designed for Microsoft and for the medium sized carpart factory in Ohio. The government ensures that the productive core of the economy makes a portion of its wealth available to society as a whole. The state serves as the relay station for the diversion of funds from the sphere of production into those sectors of the country devoted entirely to consumption. 

The state serves a different function in China. It inserts itself, like a fireproof layer, between the core and the crust, ensuring that nothing can escape from the red-hot core to the perimeters. The labor market in China today is the world’s most ruthless when it comes to employee welfare. Also if it comes to rules and regulation for foreign companies the Chinese government is not interested in leveling the playing field. 

Even deaths are tacitly accepted in Chinese economic life. According to Western estimates, there were roughly 100,000 fatal industrial accidents in 2007, including about 10,000 in the mining industry. These are the biggest casualty figures that have ever been reported in the country. 

Also public health is heavily crippled. Pollution has made cancer China’s leading cause of death, the Ministry of Health has announced. 
The use of child labor plays an important role in export promotion, an essential component of the Asian economic miracle. About seven million children are sent to work in China, and about 130 million in all of Asia. They weave carpets, haul heavy loads, and assemble plastic parts to make plastic toys, but most of all they pull down the cost of labor. 

Additionally, the state extends its protection of its productive 
core beyond the domestic front, taking great pains to do so on 
the international stage. One of the first steps it takes is to use a 
currency that is not freely convertible. By fixing an artificially low 
exchange rate for the Renminbi, the Chinese government has 
constructed a protective barrier that has served the country well. 
Foreign capital can enter the country with relative ease, but get- 
ting it back out is another story. The Chinese currency’s value rep- 
resents the biggest export promotion program a government has 
ever funded. 

The main difference between the US and China is this: The productive core of China can depend on the state for protection. The producitive core of the US can not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Iron Fist of Government: China’s<br />
Controlled Market Economy<br />
By Gabor Steingart</p>
<p>US officials like talking about free market economies doing free trade, but our todays global economy is anything but free. In the competion beween the US and a guided economy like China there is no such thing as free trade.</p>
<p>The state plays an important, perhaps even the deciding, role in<br />
the redistribution of wealth and power, even in the West. It ensures that all companies whereever they come from find a level playing field for their investment. Child labor is baned in Missippi and in North Dakota. Federal tax laws are designed for Microsoft and for the medium sized carpart factory in Ohio. The government ensures that the productive core of the economy makes a portion of its wealth available to society as a whole. The state serves as the relay station for the diversion of funds from the sphere of production into those sectors of the country devoted entirely to consumption. </p>
<p>The state serves a different function in China. It inserts itself, like a fireproof layer, between the core and the crust, ensuring that nothing can escape from the red-hot core to the perimeters. The labor market in China today is the world’s most ruthless when it comes to employee welfare. Also if it comes to rules and regulation for foreign companies the Chinese government is not interested in leveling the playing field. </p>
<p>Even deaths are tacitly accepted in Chinese economic life. According to Western estimates, there were roughly 100,000 fatal industrial accidents in 2007, including about 10,000 in the mining industry. These are the biggest casualty figures that have ever been reported in the country. </p>
<p>Also public health is heavily crippled. Pollution has made cancer China’s leading cause of death, the Ministry of Health has announced.<br />
The use of child labor plays an important role in export promotion, an essential component of the Asian economic miracle. About seven million children are sent to work in China, and about 130 million in all of Asia. They weave carpets, haul heavy loads, and assemble plastic parts to make plastic toys, but most of all they pull down the cost of labor. </p>
<p>Additionally, the state extends its protection of its productive<br />
core beyond the domestic front, taking great pains to do so on<br />
the international stage. One of the first steps it takes is to use a<br />
currency that is not freely convertible. By fixing an artificially low<br />
exchange rate for the Renminbi, the Chinese government has<br />
constructed a protective barrier that has served the country well.<br />
Foreign capital can enter the country with relative ease, but get-<br />
ting it back out is another story. The Chinese currency’s value rep-<br />
resents the biggest export promotion program a government has<br />
ever funded. </p>
<p>The main difference between the US and China is this: The productive core of China can depend on the state for protection. The producitive core of the US can not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on China Index by dummy</title>
		<link>http://www.manufacturethis.org/2008/06/18/china-index/#comment-32704</link>
		<author>dummy</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 19:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.manufacturethis.org/2008/06/18/china-index/#comment-32704</guid>
					<description>It's summer and humidity is building up.
A working dehumidifier would be helpful.
Guess what?
All models I looked are made in China. You can read online all the stories about consumers stuck with a failed dehumidifier without recourse. Maytag's supplier Fedders went into chapter 11. Their Chinese made dehumidifiers are no longer covered by the 5 year warranty. Many of them failed after 1 or 2 summers. It's at Maytag's mercy to provide possible service. 

Then I read on consumersreports.org that the best buy is LG LHD45EL. The second is Kenmore 54501 for medium capacity.

Then you read on sears.com customers' reviews. It's all the same. Almost everyone is stuck with a failed Kenmore dehumidifier.

It's no space technology to engineer a dehumidifier. The Chinese can make a good one if they want to. Why can't they? LG is a Chinese brand, but Maytag and Kenmore are American brands.

The question is "Why can't the Chinese make a working dehumidifier for American brand?"

Is it about market share war or is it about weak American manufacturing?
Will LG take over Kenmore, GE and Maytag in the world market?

Are our manufacturers so dumb to let go of our economic engine - manufacturing for good?

Well, the need is real. We need a working dehumidifier and I won't buy an LG or Haier, another Chinese brand. 
The optimized maximal profits strategy used by all global American companies are failing us and our economy. 

Why can German still export German made products and we let it all outsourced to China? I may have to buy a German made dehumidifier this summer. Irresponsible manufacturing is detrimental to our environment and waste of energy.  If we want to keep some American brands, we must manufacture products ourselves, even at a higher price. - a frustrated and angry consumer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s summer and humidity is building up.<br />
A working dehumidifier would be helpful.<br />
Guess what?<br />
All models I looked are made in China. You can read online all the stories about consumers stuck with a failed dehumidifier without recourse. Maytag&#8217;s supplier Fedders went into chapter 11. Their Chinese made dehumidifiers are no longer covered by the 5 year warranty. Many of them failed after 1 or 2 summers. It&#8217;s at Maytag&#8217;s mercy to provide possible service. </p>
<p>Then I read on consumersreports.org that the best buy is LG LHD45EL. The second is Kenmore 54501 for medium capacity.</p>
<p>Then you read on sears.com customers&#8217; reviews. It&#8217;s all the same. Almost everyone is stuck with a failed Kenmore dehumidifier.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s no space technology to engineer a dehumidifier. The Chinese can make a good one if they want to. Why can&#8217;t they? LG is a Chinese brand, but Maytag and Kenmore are American brands.</p>
<p>The question is &#8220;Why can&#8217;t the Chinese make a working dehumidifier for American brand?&#8221;</p>
<p>Is it about market share war or is it about weak American manufacturing?<br />
Will LG take over Kenmore, GE and Maytag in the world market?</p>
<p>Are our manufacturers so dumb to let go of our economic engine - manufacturing for good?</p>
<p>Well, the need is real. We need a working dehumidifier and I won&#8217;t buy an LG or Haier, another Chinese brand.<br />
The optimized maximal profits strategy used by all global American companies are failing us and our economy. </p>
<p>Why can German still export German made products and we let it all outsourced to China? I may have to buy a German made dehumidifier this summer. Irresponsible manufacturing is detrimental to our environment and waste of energy.  If we want to keep some American brands, we must manufacture products ourselves, even at a higher price. - a frustrated and angry consumer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on You Get What You Peg For by Barry</title>
		<link>http://www.manufacturethis.org/2008/06/12/you-get-what-you-peg-for/#comment-31095</link>
		<author>Barry</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 18:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.manufacturethis.org/2008/06/12/you-get-what-you-peg-for/#comment-31095</guid>
					<description>Seems like more foot dragging while the country slides into a depression.  Another major company here in Illinois has announced its closure, (Affinia Group Inc. Announces Plans To Close Three Manufacturing Facilities). They have been in business since 1905.   Affinia sited being unable to compete with Red China as the issue.  They shipped all of their manufacturing to non other than Red China and Mexico.   

Those Representatives who voted in favor of Free Trade have effectively brought down the U.S.A. from the inside where no outside enemy ever could.  It is apparent these over educated morons in government are blind, greedy, and totally STUPID.  

When bullets fly during the upcoming war I hope our so called Allies will help us like we helped them….but I truly doubt it.  

God save the U.S.A. from the elected MORONS called Congressmen, Senators, and President.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems like more foot dragging while the country slides into a depression.  Another major company here in Illinois has announced its closure, (Affinia Group Inc. Announces Plans To Close Three Manufacturing Facilities). They have been in business since 1905.   Affinia sited being unable to compete with Red China as the issue.  They shipped all of their manufacturing to non other than Red China and Mexico.   </p>
<p>Those Representatives who voted in favor of Free Trade have effectively brought down the U.S.A. from the inside where no outside enemy ever could.  It is apparent these over educated morons in government are blind, greedy, and totally STUPID.  </p>
<p>When bullets fly during the upcoming war I hope our so called Allies will help us like we helped them….but I truly doubt it.  </p>
<p>God save the U.S.A. from the elected MORONS called Congressmen, Senators, and President.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on In the Pipeline by Mickey Bolt</title>
		<link>http://www.manufacturethis.org/2008/06/02/in-the-pipeline/#comment-29752</link>
		<author>Mickey Bolt</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 08:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.manufacturethis.org/2008/06/02/in-the-pipeline/#comment-29752</guid>
					<description>We are very happy that the U. S. Department of Commerce has concluded that Chinese steel pipe and tube manufactures have been dumping their product into the United States, but more importantly, that the Chinese government has been providing them with large subsidies.  Finished Chinese steel pipe is sold in this country at a lower cost than the raw material costs for the American manufactures.  Large government subsidies allow a foreign manufacture to ship their product over here and sell their finished product cheaper than the American Manufactures' raw material cost.  This has resulted in a nearly 7,000% increase in steel pipe imports from China since 2002!
If the U. S. Department of Commerce rulings result in final duties then American steel pipe and tube manufactures such as  Wheatland Tube and Sharon Tube will begin to compete against pipe producers in China and NOT the Chinese government.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are very happy that the U. S. Department of Commerce has concluded that Chinese steel pipe and tube manufactures have been dumping their product into the United States, but more importantly, that the Chinese government has been providing them with large subsidies.  Finished Chinese steel pipe is sold in this country at a lower cost than the raw material costs for the American manufactures.  Large government subsidies allow a foreign manufacture to ship their product over here and sell their finished product cheaper than the American Manufactures&#8217; raw material cost.  This has resulted in a nearly 7,000% increase in steel pipe imports from China since 2002!<br />
If the U. S. Department of Commerce rulings result in final duties then American steel pipe and tube manufactures such as  Wheatland Tube and Sharon Tube will begin to compete against pipe producers in China and NOT the Chinese government.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on For once, the New York Times gets it right by Joanne Rainey</title>
		<link>http://www.manufacturethis.org/2008/05/09/for-once-the-new-york-times-gets-it-right/#comment-27780</link>
		<author>Joanne Rainey</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 19:27:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.manufacturethis.org/2008/05/09/for-once-the-new-york-times-gets-it-right/#comment-27780</guid>
					<description>The World is Flat, and American Manufacturing is Falling off the Edge. 

I am a Supply Chain consultant for small to mid-sized manufacturing companies. I used to be a Sr. Commodity Manager for a Fortune 100 company, and 6 years ago I left as I saw the writing on the wall for global outsourcing to low cost countries.  I wanted to be a part of keeping manufacturing in American, not moving it out. I wanted to help the small to mid-sized companies improve their supply chain and production operations so they would be better able to compete against outsourcing by being more efficient. And they had room for lots of improvement; I saw it every day managing these suppliers.

Surprise, no one seemed to care!  Many companies thought they were doing a good enough job even though their technology and processes resembled something from the 1970’s.  God helps those who help themselves, but I guess we forgot that and now everyone wants the government to step in and protect their right to do business the same way they have been doing it for the past 30 years. Forget investing in continuous process improvement, forget improving and educating their labor resource skills, and forget capitalism allowing for survival of the fittest.  That all costs money, time, and effort!  And worst of all, that requires CHANGE!  If the government protects our way of doing business without forcing drastic and immediate change, it will be the kiss of death for our manufacturing.  Not only will WE not be able to afford our Made in the USA products, neither will the rest of the world.

If our companies are not eager and willing to change, they will not be here anymore, and they don't deserve to be. We have the best workforce in the world, but we feel entitled and have given up the passion behind why we do business. If you are a manufacturing company, and you do not have a working ERP system, Lean Manufacturing processes, skilled supply chain and production operations employees, and either a partner or a sister division in Mexico, Asia, or the Eastern Block to give you a global footprint, you will die.  These are hard words, but it is time hard times. There is no more time left.  And I don’t see anyone talking about our own accountability and what we need to do to step up to the plate. 

I know this is just one piece of the puzzle, but it is an important piece. The first presidential candidate that stops talking about “protecting” American manufacturing jobs and starts talking about using our tax dollars to subsidize the improvement of American companies through technology and education is getting my vote, whether they are a Democrat or a Republican.

In the meantime, in the words of Thomas Friedman (The World is Flat): Change or die.  If you don’t know how, get help now.  How you did business yesterday will not keep you in business tomorrow. We cannot (and should not) subsidize your inefficiencies. It is time to stand up and fight back, not by knocking down what others are doing better than us but by improving ourselves. Who’s up for the challenge?  
The Supply Chain Gal</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The World is Flat, and American Manufacturing is Falling off the Edge. </p>
<p>I am a Supply Chain consultant for small to mid-sized manufacturing companies. I used to be a Sr. Commodity Manager for a Fortune 100 company, and 6 years ago I left as I saw the writing on the wall for global outsourcing to low cost countries.  I wanted to be a part of keeping manufacturing in American, not moving it out. I wanted to help the small to mid-sized companies improve their supply chain and production operations so they would be better able to compete against outsourcing by being more efficient. And they had room for lots of improvement; I saw it every day managing these suppliers.</p>
<p>Surprise, no one seemed to care!  Many companies thought they were doing a good enough job even though their technology and processes resembled something from the 1970’s.  God helps those who help themselves, but I guess we forgot that and now everyone wants the government to step in and protect their right to do business the same way they have been doing it for the past 30 years. Forget investing in continuous process improvement, forget improving and educating their labor resource skills, and forget capitalism allowing for survival of the fittest.  That all costs money, time, and effort!  And worst of all, that requires CHANGE!  If the government protects our way of doing business without forcing drastic and immediate change, it will be the kiss of death for our manufacturing.  Not only will WE not be able to afford our Made in the USA products, neither will the rest of the world.</p>
<p>If our companies are not eager and willing to change, they will not be here anymore, and they don&#8217;t deserve to be. We have the best workforce in the world, but we feel entitled and have given up the passion behind why we do business. If you are a manufacturing company, and you do not have a working ERP system, Lean Manufacturing processes, skilled supply chain and production operations employees, and either a partner or a sister division in Mexico, Asia, or the Eastern Block to give you a global footprint, you will die.  These are hard words, but it is time hard times. There is no more time left.  And I don’t see anyone talking about our own accountability and what we need to do to step up to the plate. </p>
<p>I know this is just one piece of the puzzle, but it is an important piece. The first presidential candidate that stops talking about “protecting” American manufacturing jobs and starts talking about using our tax dollars to subsidize the improvement of American companies through technology and education is getting my vote, whether they are a Democrat or a Republican.</p>
<p>In the meantime, in the words of Thomas Friedman (The World is Flat): Change or die.  If you don’t know how, get help now.  How you did business yesterday will not keep you in business tomorrow. We cannot (and should not) subsidize your inefficiencies. It is time to stand up and fight back, not by knocking down what others are doing better than us but by improving ourselves. Who’s up for the challenge?<br />
The Supply Chain Gal</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on China Cheats, Pennsylvania Workers Lose by Small Cnc Milling Machine</title>
		<link>http://www.manufacturethis.org/2008/03/25/china-cheats-pennsylvania-workers-lose/#comment-27592</link>
		<author>Small Cnc Milling Machine</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.manufacturethis.org/2008/03/25/china-cheats-pennsylvania-workers-lose/#comment-27592</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;Small Cnc Milling Machine...&lt;/strong&gt;

I found your site on technorati and read a few of your other posts. Keep up the good work. I just added your RSS feed to my Google News Reader. Looking forward to reading more from you....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Small Cnc Milling Machine&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I found your site on technorati and read a few of your other posts. Keep up the good work. I just added your RSS feed to my Google News Reader. Looking forward to reading more from you&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
