Competing on the Cheap

Posted by SCapozzola on January 10th, 2008

Adherents of free trade often espouse the idea of “comparative advantage.”  This means that countries should specialize in manufacturing those products for which they are best suited, or for which they have the most natural resources.  An agricultural country might focus on growing cotton, while a more industrial country might utilize that cotton in their textile factories.  Comparative advantage suggests that it would be less beneficial if both countries tried to grow cotton and produce finished clothing.

This notion of “specialization” worked far better in the 19th Century, when it was first posited.  But in the 21st Century, countries find very little to differentiate their respective productive capacities.  The United States can make silicon chips and TV sets, but so can Mexico, Vietnam, and Taiwan.  In a “globalized age” most countries now possess essentially the same industrial capacity.  And so, in order to get a leg up on the competition, countries sometimes adopt unsavory tactics—like exploiting their own people as a source of low-cost labor.

  With that in mind, ManufactureThis wants to share an interesting video on YouTube—footage of Chinese workers laboring inside a hydraulic stamping press.  These kinds of labor conditions are absolutely prohibited in the U.S. 

Thankfully, American workers are not put in these situations.
##

2 Responses to “Competing on the Cheap”

  1. Manufacture This » Blog Archive » When Truth and Habit Clash Says:

    […] of the benefits of something “comparative advantage.”  ManufactureThis has discussed the topic previously, and suffice it to say that comparative advantage suggests that countries trade best when they […]

  2. Manufacture This » Blog Archive » China Sin-Drome Says:

    […] and lead-based toys that are discouraging American from buying Chinese exports, however.  Growing awareness of labor abuses and wanton environmental pollution has discouraged many Americans from supporting […]

Leave a Reply